A workplace dispute involving Tech Mahindra and an employee in Hyderabad has attracted public attention after allegations concerning workplace treatment, medical leave and termination were shared widely on social media.
The dispute involves R Bhavana, a software engineer who has alleged that she faced difficulties during her employment and that her grievances were not adequately addressed. She also staged a protest outside Tech Mahindra’s Hyderabad office seeking resolution of the issues she has raised.
Posts shared on social media said Bhavana was seeking action over issues including pending allowances, notice-period matters and what she described as an unfair termination. Some posts also claimed that climate activist Ruchith supported the protest. These claims have not been independently verified.
Employee’s allegations
According to reports based on Bhavana’s account, she experienced difficulties after suffering a serious injury and taking medical leave. She alleged that she was repeatedly asked to return to work before she had fully recovered.
She also claimed that communications from the company warned of disciplinary action if she failed to report to work. In addition, Bhavana reportedly raised concerns about scrutiny of her movements during working hours and said her concerns following a medical emergency involving her daughter were not adequately addressed.
These allegations represent the employee’s account and have not been independently established.
Tech Mahindra’s response
Tech Mahindra has disputed the claim that Bhavana was terminated and said she remains an active employee.
The company said Bhavana joined its Hyderabad office on March 26, 2026, and raised the termination allegation on July 23. According to the company, she was informed that her employment had not been terminated and that her July salary was processed as usual.
Tech Mahindra acknowledged that a communication referring to “abandonment of services” was issued on July 22. However, the company said the separation process was not implemented.
The company also said Bhavana had taken 27 working days of leave between her joining date and July 22. It said this included 12 planned leave days and 15 unplanned leave days, and that she had been asked to resume work and provide the necessary medical documentation.
Workplace grievance questions
The conflicting accounts have placed attention on broader questions around employee grievance mechanisms, communication during medical leave and the handling of workplace disputes.
The episode also highlights how employment-related disagreements can quickly attract wider public attention when employees use social media or public demonstrations to seek a resolution.
As the two sides have presented different accounts of the employment status and events surrounding the dispute, further clarification or documentation from the parties could be important in establishing the full sequence of events.
At present, the allegations made by Bhavana and the company’s response should be viewed separately, as the publicly reported accounts remain disputed.
Get it on Play Store