The Madras High Court has held that an employee cannot claim Special Grade benefits in a previous post by postponing the assumption of a promotional position after receiving a promotion order.
A Division Bench comprising Justice N. Sathish Kumar and Justice M. Jothiraman dismissed an appeal filed by former Agriculture Department employee M. Balasubramanian, who had sought Special Grade benefits after completing 20 years of service.
According to court records, Balasubramanian was appointed as an Agricultural Officer and had previously received Selection Grade benefits upon completing the required years of service. Before he became eligible for the next career progression benefit, namely the Special Grade, he was promoted to the post of Assistant Director on December 17, 2012.
The employee did not immediately join the promoted post and instead proceeded on medical leave. He assumed charge as Assistant Director on January 20, 2013, by which time he had completed 20 years of service. He subsequently contended that he had become eligible for the Special Grade in the post of Agricultural Officer.
Balasubramanian challenged the pay fixation carried out by the Accountant General, which did not extend the Special Grade benefit. His petition was earlier dismissed by a Single Judge, following which he filed an appeal before the Division Bench.
The High Court observed that although the employee completed the qualifying period on January 20, 2013, the promotion order had already been issued more than a month earlier. The Bench noted that employees who receive promotions before completing the required service period for Special Grade benefits generally cannot claim such benefits in their previous position.
The judges further observed that the delayed assumption of the promoted post appeared to have been intended to secure an additional financial benefit.
Finding no error in the revised pay fixation or the earlier order, the Division Bench upheld the Single Judge’s decision and dismissed the appeal in the case of M. Balasubramanian v. The Director of Agriculture and Others.
